2010 RB Lache Seastrunk

shoelessjoe · 01-09-2009, 08:22 PM

I read that and from what I gather Reed is all LSU.

islstl · 01-09-2009, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shoelessjoe

I read that and from what I gather Reed is all LSU.

Ok, so it is Reed.

You have that link? I went back to try and find it but couldn't.

TheDude · 01-09-2009, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by islstl

That's why I was clamoring to get Michael this year.

Lache is not the reason Michael was not offered and you have read plenty to substantiate that.

Quote:

I thought I remember Seastrunk saying he and another player LSU was interested in wants to go to the same school? Anybody remember reading that? Trevon Reed?

Yes, him.

And reading the actual quotes from Seastrunk lead one to believe that LSU leads. He certainly speaks of LSU(back home) in a different light. I imagine USC and UT will try very hard for him. Well, UT will until they ask him to commit, and when he doesn't, they will say they never offered him.

MLUTiger · 01-09-2009, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by islstl

Texsport, just a FYI, use the Search This Forum function over at the upper right and put in the last name of the player and you will almost always something that we have previously started.

Only paid members have access to the search function I believe.

deuce985 · 01-09-2009, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shoelessjoe

Weren't we the favorite for him at one time? First it was Mike Dyer then LS. I thought that was part of the reason we were not after Christian Michael that hard.

Doesn't work like that. You don't look ahead and hold out on a guy NOW and put all your eggs in the basket for the future. If you see a guy you like, you take him now, regardless of the situation next year. LS is a OOS recruit too, which are never guarantees.

And yes, the package deal was with Reed. Ford is also related to LS, which helps us with him even more.

islstl · 01-09-2009, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MLUTiger

Only paid members have access to the search function I believe.

Yeah I never got clarification on that.

That sucks.

islstl · 01-09-2009, 09:25 PM

The entire reason we didn't take Michael was because he was too much like Ford. So the staff didn't think we needed 2 identical type backs, which does make sense.

Let's just hope we land Seastrunk. He claims he runs a low 4.3 consistently.

Andouille · 01-09-2009, 09:29 PM

This is the one kid I want to be a Tiger more than any recruit I have seen since I started following recruiting.

If LSU continues to recruit top 10 classes and this kid becomes a Tiger, LSU will be unstoppable. He will be LSU's Tebow.

TheDude · 01-09-2009, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by islstl

The entire reason we didn't take Michael was because he was too much like Ford. So the staff didn't think we needed 2 identical type backs, which does make sense.

That has been assumed. But the same guys that put that in print, Sonny/Mike, have also talked about him being soft, and not tough enough to play for the likes of LSU, UT, and OU, hence no scholarship offers. They have also opined that he did not workout for LSU, and therefore did not get an offer. Pick anything you like.

The real reason is not known, as nobody here, or Rivals, or Scout, is on the coaching staff and that info has not gotten out.

uscvball · 01-09-2009, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by islstl

bump for Texsport

Looks like USC could be a major player at this early stage. But we shall see.

He likes our socks anyway.

bmy- · 01-09-2009, 09:37 PM

Wait..

It's pronounced Lake?

La-chay sounds so much cooler.

islstl · 01-09-2009, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDude

That has been assumed. But the same guys that put that in print, Sonny/Mike, have also talked about him being soft, and not tough enough to play for the likes of LSU, UT, and OU, hence no scholarship offers. They have also opined that he did not workout for LSU, and therefore did not get an offer. Pick anything you like.

The real reason is not known, as nobody here, or Rivals, or Scout, is on the coaching staff and that info has not gotten out.

Yes the entire catastrophe of him not showing up on multiple occasions during the summer when he said he would hurt his chances big time it appears. And then he wondered why he wasn't offered when he did finally show up.

We'll see where he is in 3 years at A&M. I think he will blow it up.

MLUTiger · 01-10-2009, 12:00 AM

I agree because if I have a message board pet peeve, it's creating a new thread when one has already been created for that topic.

tboy · 01-10-2009, 12:04 AM

I just watched Seastrunks' highlights on youtube. Compared to the players he is competing against, which is the only way to judge game speed, he is the fastest player I have ever seen. Oh, and he can cut and change directions very well. His biggest weakness seems to be his size. He looks thin and smallish and there are no highlights that I saw where he breaks many tackles. He runs like it is a touch football game, not tackle from my limited viewing. You definately want him on your team to use in space or hit a hole, but I don't think he can be an every down back unless he puts on some muscle and gets stronger, which he may well do since he is an underclassman. Wow, is he fast though!

islstl · 01-10-2009, 12:08 AM

Seastrunk is almost a guaranteed 5 star, and Reed will be close.

Texsport · 01-10-2009, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MLUTiger

I agree because if I have a message board pet peeve, it's creating a new thread when one has already been created for that topic.

That's not too encouraging of full participation by viewers. Sorry we all don't sit here all day, every day waiting for the next post.

I guess I'll just exit this board and leave it to the self appointed Tiger Forum Police since there's nothing new to be seen here!

Out!

Texsport

Andouille · 01-10-2009, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texsport

That's not too encouraging of full participation by viewers. Sorry we all don't sit here all day, every day waiting for the next post.

I guess I'll just exit this board and leave it to the self appointed Tiger Forum Police since there's nothing new to be seen here!

Out!

Texsport

Don't leave bro. Some regulars forget what it's like to be new on the forum. It's no big deal.

islstl · 01-10-2009, 07:53 AM

Yeah Texsport, he wasn't directing that at you.

He realizes you have no control over it.

Btw, how's Sugarland these days? I used to live in Stafford.

Cajun Sensation · 01-10-2009, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texsport

That's not too encouraging of full participation by viewers. Sorry we all don't sit here all day, every day waiting for the next post.

I guess I'll just exit this board and leave it to the self appointed Tiger Forum Police since there's nothing new to be seen here!

Out!

Texsport

Dont sweat it Texsport. Some get a little finicky on here. Don't let it run you off. Stick around for a while. Andouille's right, some forget what it's like to be new on TF.

You are right, Lache Seastrunk is one of the most amazing talents that I've ever seen. I watch his highlights in awe. I can only HOPE that he comes to LSU.

mobius481 · 01-10-2009, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by islstl

Texsport, just a FYI, use the Search This Forum function over at the upper right and put in the last name of the player and you will almost always something that we have previously started.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MLUTiger

Only paid members have access to the search function I believe.

Quote:

Originally Posted by islstl

Yeah I never got clarification on that.

That sucks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MLUTiger

I agree because if I have a message board pet peeve, it's creating a new thread when one has already been created for that topic.

This is the sting of events. He was saying I agree to that sucks about not having the search function because he doesn't like new threads being started but completely blaming it on you not having the search function and not you screwing up your posts. Stick around a while.

MLUTiger · 01-10-2009, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texsport

That's not too encouraging of full participation by viewers. Sorry we all don't sit here all day, every day waiting for the next post.

I guess I'll just exit this board and leave it to the self appointed Tiger Forum Police since there's nothing new to be seen here!

Out!

Texsport

It was definitely not a shot at you, being that I suffer from the same affliction of not being able to search for anything. I either risk starting a double post or waiting for someone else to bump it to the top just like you do.

tirk · 01-10-2009, 11:05 AM

so its not lachey? i thought he was named after nick.

lake? really? bah

islstl · 01-10-2009, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tirk

so its not lachey? i thought he was named after nick.

lake? really? bah

It appears he was named after Rikki instead.

TigerBait3 · 01-10-2009, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texsport

That's not too encouraging of full participation by viewers. Sorry we all don't sit here all day, every day waiting for the next post.

I guess I'll just exit this board and leave it to the self appointed Tiger Forum Police since there's nothing new to be seen here!

Out!

Texsport

Create more threads. Its no biggie. Most forums that get new members and page views dont force new people to merge threads that are two years old.

deuce985 · 01-10-2009, 12:18 PM

One would visit TD.com and see what happens when you don't merge threads over there.

I like it here...hope they keep it like it is. Small, compact, clean and competent posters.

01-09-2009, 08:22 PM	#26
shoelessjoe Registered Guest Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 136	Re: 2010 RB Lache Seastrunk I read that and from what I gather Reed is all LSU.

01-09-2009, 09:25 PM	#32
islstl Saints SB 44 Champs! Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL Posts: 26,120	Re: 2010 RB Lache Seastrunk The entire reason we didn't take Michael was because he was too much like Ford. So the staff didn't think we needed 2 identical type backs, which does make sense. Let's just hope we land Seastrunk. He claims he runs a low 4.3 consistently. __________________

01-09-2009, 09:29 PM	#33
Andouille Registered Guest Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 569	Re: 2010 RB Lache Seastrunk This is the one kid I want to be a Tiger more than any recruit I have seen since I started following recruiting. If LSU continues to recruit top 10 classes and this kid becomes a Tiger, LSU will be unstoppable. He will be LSU's Tebow.

01-09-2009, 09:37 PM	#36
bmy- Registered Guest Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,006	Re: Lache ( Lake ) Seastrunk Wait.. It's pronounced Lake? La-chay sounds so much cooler.

01-10-2009, 12:00 AM	#38
MLUTiger Secular Humanist Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 2,047	Re: Lache ( Lake ) Seastrunk I agree because if I have a message board pet peeve, it's creating a new thread when one has already been created for that topic. __________________

01-10-2009, 12:04 AM	#39
tboy Registered Guest Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,272	Re: 2010 RB Lache Seastrunk I just watched Seastrunks' highlights on youtube. Compared to the players he is competing against, which is the only way to judge game speed, he is the fastest player I have ever seen. Oh, and he can cut and change directions very well. His biggest weakness seems to be his size. He looks thin and smallish and there are no highlights that I saw where he breaks many tackles. He runs like it is a touch football game, not tackle from my limited viewing. You definately want him on your team to use in space or hit a hole, but I don't think he can be an every down back unless he puts on some muscle and gets stronger, which he may well do since he is an underclassman. Wow, is he fast though!

01-10-2009, 12:08 AM	#40
islstl Saints SB 44 Champs! Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL Posts: 26,120	Re: 2010 RB Lache Seastrunk Seastrunk is almost a guaranteed 5 star, and Reed will be close. __________________

01-10-2009, 07:53 AM	#43
islstl Saints SB 44 Champs! Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL Posts: 26,120	Re: Lache ( Lake ) Seastrunk Yeah Texsport, he wasn't directing that at you. He realizes you have no control over it. Btw, how's Sugarland these days? I used to live in Stafford. __________________

01-10-2009, 11:05 AM	#47
tirk Party with Lombardi Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: work Posts: 19,949	Re: Lache ( Lake ) Seastrunk so its not lachey? i thought he was named after nick. lake? really? bah __________________ This message is hidden because is on your ignore list.

01-10-2009, 12:18 PM	#50
deuce985 Registered Guest Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 599	Re: Lache ( Lake ) Seastrunk One would visit TD.com and see what happens when you don't merge threads over there. I like it here...hope they keep it like it is. Small, compact, clean and competent posters.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search